Smiley face
Weather     Live Markets

Supreme Court to Hear Arguments in Key Case on Affirmative Action

WASHINGTON, D.C. (October 26, 2023) – The Supreme Court is set to hear oral arguments on Monday in a landmark case challenging the use of race as a factor in college admissions, potentially reshaping the landscape of higher education across the United States. The case, Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard College and Students for Fair Admissions v. University of North Carolina, consolidated for oral argument, directly questions the constitutionality of affirmative action policies.

The Supreme Court will consider whether race-conscious admissions programs violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA), the plaintiff in both cases, argues that these policies discriminate against Asian American and white applicants.

The Core of the Debate

The central question revolves around whether universities can continue to consider race as one factor among many in their holistic review process to achieve a diverse student body. Proponents of affirmative action argue that diversity enriches the educational experience for all students and is essential for preparing future leaders in a diverse society. Affirmative action policies, they contend, aim to address historical and ongoing systemic inequalities faced by underrepresented minority groups.

Potential Implications

A ruling against affirmative action could have far-reaching consequences for colleges and universities nationwide. Many institutions have long relied on race-conscious admissions policies to achieve a diverse student body. If the Supreme Court strikes down these policies, experts predict a significant decline in enrollment of students from underrepresented minority groups, particularly Black and Hispanic students.

Opponents of affirmative action, including SFFA, argue that considering race in admissions is inherently discriminatory and violates the principle of equal opportunity. They advocate for race-neutral admissions policies based solely on merit and individual qualifications.

Arguments Before the Court

The Justices will hear arguments from both sides, exploring the legal precedents surrounding affirmative action, the societal benefits of diversity, and the potential harms of race-conscious admissions. Previous Supreme Court decisions, including Fisher v. University of Texas (2016) and Grutter v. Bollinger (2003), affirmed the limited use of race in admissions but emphasized the need for strict scrutiny and a compelling interest.

A Nation Watching

The case has garnered significant national attention, with numerous amicus briefs filed by civil rights organizations, universities, businesses, and individuals on both sides of the issue. The Supreme Court’s decision, expected in the summer of 2024, is highly anticipated and could have profound implications for the future of higher education and diversity in the United States. (Read related articles on diversity in higher education) This case represents a pivotal moment in the ongoing debate over race, equality, and opportunity in America.

Share.