The Southern Methodist University (SMU) Mustangs are gearing up for a high-stakes showdown against the Clemson Tigers in the Atlantic Coast Conference (ACC) championship game, a contest that could propel them into the coveted College Football Playoffs. Adding to the excitement, the university announced that their beloved mascot, Peruna IX, a Shetland pony, will be making the trip to Charlotte, North Carolina, to rally the team and fans. However, this decision has sparked controversy, with animal rights organization People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) vehemently opposing the inclusion of the live mascot.
PETA has publicly denounced SMU’s decision, characterizing it as a “senseless stunt” and an “archaic tradition.” The organization argues that subjecting Peruna IX to the cacophony of a packed stadium, filled with roaring fans, blaring music, and the general chaos of a championship game, is cruel and potentially harmful to the pony’s well-being. They emphasize that ponies are prey animals, naturally predisposed to fear and flight in response to loud noises and unfamiliar environments. PETA has implored SMU President R. Gerald Turner to reconsider Peruna’s participation, advocating for the university to prioritize the animal’s welfare over tradition.
PETA’s concerns extend beyond the immediate stress of the game environment. They argue that using Peruna as a mascot, parading him in front of large crowds, essentially reduces him to a “prop” rather than recognizing him as a sentient being with individual needs and sensitivities. Their campaign against the use of Peruna IX underscores a broader debate about the ethical implications of employing live animals as mascots, particularly in high-pressure, stimulating environments like sporting events. They believe that such practices prioritize entertainment over the animals’ well-being and perpetuate an outdated view of animals as mere symbols or tools for human amusement.
Despite PETA’s fervent objections and public pressure, SMU appears resolute in its decision to include Peruna IX in the festivities. The university has not issued a formal response to PETA’s letter or their social media campaign, indicating that the long-standing tradition of Peruna’s presence at major games will continue. This unwavering stance reflects a deep-rooted connection to the mascot, which has been a symbol of SMU spirit and pride since 1932. While the tradition has evolved over the years, with Peruna no longer charging the field after touchdowns, his role in leading the team onto the field and appearing between quarters remains a cherished part of the SMU game day experience.
The clash between tradition and animal welfare highlights a complex dilemma facing many institutions that utilize live mascots. Balancing the desire to uphold cherished traditions with the growing awareness of animal rights and ethical treatment presents a significant challenge. While SMU may view Peruna’s presence as a symbol of school spirit and a way to connect with its history, critics argue that it comes at the expense of the animal’s well-being. This tension underscores the need for ongoing dialogue and consideration of alternative ways to celebrate school spirit without compromising the welfare of live animals.
The upcoming ACC championship game, therefore, serves as a focal point for this debate. Peruna IX’s appearance will undoubtedly be met with mixed reactions – enthusiastic cheers from loyal fans and concerned disapproval from animal rights advocates. The outcome of the game itself, while significant for the SMU Mustangs and their playoff aspirations, may be overshadowed by the larger conversation about the ethical treatment of animals and the role of live mascots in collegiate sports. This incident could potentially spark further scrutiny of similar practices at other institutions and contribute to a broader discussion about the future of live mascots in sports and entertainment.
