Trump Advisors Reportedly Discuss Bringing NYC Mayor Adams into Administration to Influence Mayoral Race

In a surprising political development, a recent report from the New York Times suggests that advisors to former President Donald Trump have discussed offering current New York City Mayor Eric Adams a position in the Trump administration. This alleged strategy appears aimed at disrupting the New York City mayoral race, potentially undermining Democratic socialist candidate Zohran Mamdani’s chances while paving the way for former Governor Andrew Cuomo to win the November election. The White House has maintained silence on these claims, declining to respond to requests for comment from Fox News Digital, leaving many questions unanswered about the potential political maneuver.

According to the report, Trump’s team allegedly engaged with Adams’ associates about the possibility of the current mayor stepping away from the race to join the Trump administration. While specifics about potential positions remain unclear, and there’s no indication whether Adams would consider such an offer, the political implications would be significant. Mayor Adams’ campaign has firmly denied these rumors, with spokesperson Todd Shapiro stating that Adams “has had no discussions with, nor has he met with, President Donald Trump regarding the mayoral race.” Shapiro emphasized that the mayor remains “fully committed to winning this election” and is focused on building upon his record, where “crime is down, jobs are up, and he has consistently stood up for working families.”

The New York City mayoral race has become increasingly complex following the Democratic primary in June, where Mamdani, a Ugandan-born Muslim and Democratic socialist who currently serves as a New York State assemblyman from Queens, secured the Democratic Party’s nomination. This victory prompted former Governor Andrew Cuomo to enter the race as an independent candidate after his defeat in the Democratic primary. The potential involvement of the Trump administration in this local election underscores the national significance being placed on who leads America’s largest city, particularly given the ideological divide between the progressive Mamdani and the more moderate Cuomo.

Trump himself has not shied away from commenting on the New York mayoral race, despite claiming not to be involved. During a July Cabinet meeting, the former president warned New Yorkers against voting for Mamdani, stating, “No. 1, you have a communist running, and you shouldn’t vote for him. He’s a disaster.” Trump further emphasized his concerns about the political direction, adding, “I used to say we will not ever be a socialist country… Well, I’ll say it again. We’re not going to have — if a communist gets elected to run New York, it can never be the same.” These statements reflect the heightened rhetoric surrounding the race, with national political figures weighing in on what would typically be considered a local election.

The reported discussions between Trump advisors and Adams’ team reveal the intricate political calculations at play in the current political landscape. For Trump’s team, supporting Cuomo—a Democrat but one considered more moderate than Mamdani—might represent a strategic choice to prevent what they view as a far-left politician from leading New York City. For Adams, who has faced challenges during his term as mayor, including ongoing investigations, a position in the Trump administration could offer a new political direction. Meanwhile, for Cuomo, who resigned as governor amid sexual harassment allegations in 2021, this election represents a potential political comeback, one that might be strengthened if Adams were to exit the race.

This development comes as Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders has endorsed Mamdani, further highlighting the ideological divisions within the Democratic Party. The Washington Post has reportedly criticized Mamdani as potentially disastrous for New York City, adding to the contentious nature of the race. The phrase “Globalize the Intifada” has also stirred tensions on the campaign trail amidst the ongoing Middle East conflict, demonstrating how international issues are influencing local politics. As millions of New Yorkers prepare to cast their votes, the outcome of this election will not only determine the leadership of America’s largest city but may also signal broader political trends and alliances that could shape national politics in the years to come.