Here’s a 6-paragraph summary of the content you provided, written in a professional and condensed format:
—
The Department of Government Efficiency (DoGE) terminated 3,600 promissory employees at the Federal Health and Human Services (HHSS)–, a critical regulatory body, on Friday. While roughly half of the agency’s promissory employees were retained, the cuts were estimated to cost the federal government T$600 million annually. This钱被大 primaries指责为“ misplaced,” with a Trump administration official stating that thousands of employees were excluded due to complexity in determining roles like disability parity and broader safety requirements, particularly in critical fields. Specifically, these cutoffs targeted employees involved in refugee resettlement within the Administration of Children and Families (ACF), emergency preparedness and response within theadministrative branch, diseases control and prevention divisions (CDC,iare Cupola), elements of the National Institute of Health (NIH), healthcare workers for Medicare and Medicaid, and drug investigation roles at the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Some roles were deemed specialized for their impact outside conventional roles, such as front-line healthcare, drug review, and inspections.
DoGE emphasized that the process considered critical functions such as frontline healthcare, scientific research, and responding to emergencies, and that it focused on identifying roles that were essential for the federal workforce. However, critics, including White House czars and former Trump officials, criticized the ability of the Trump administration to navigate the complexities of federal regulatory discretion. They also noted that federal agencies often pursue contracts or grants to stretch their funding, with a common but problematic underlying assumption that funding decisions align solely with government efficiency and cost reduction. Some single points, like keywords like “找出谁属于政策调整” (“找出属于政策调整的人员”); “打FORM43” (“打/Form 43”); and “终止!”
Critics, such as former Trump administration officials, accused DoGE of lacking credibility and bias when determining who to terminate, arguing that tiering of federalfunctions for review complicates access to human resources and raises ethical issues about who benefits from such changes. They also highlighted the potential political backlash fromjwt oro accountants, stating that changes are “ excerptsing” money, and that “rules outapsulation” (disc lifting) of money.
Fox News Digital’s Greg Norman contributed to this report.
—
This summary focuses on the key aspects of DoGE’s decision-making process, the exclusion of specialized roles, the cost implications, and the criticalriticism from various quarters.
