Five law firms, including Kirkland & Ellis, Latham & Watkins, A & O Shearman and Simpson Thacher & Bartlett, and Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft, have agreed to provide a combined $600 million in free legal services to support campaigns centered on the prescription drug market and supporting entities under President Trump’s#### leadership. The agreement came on Friday, held by the White House through social media. Each firm agreed to offer pro bono or free legal work to 1–3% of the broadly supported causes shaping Trump’s policies. Among the firms, Kirkland & Ellis received $125 million, while others received varying amounts, with Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft being led by 100 million dollars. The agreements were各行 negotiated during a week marked by-interface discussions with Trump, where the administration highlighted the firms’ potential to_GATE truth-based legal services to President Trump’s agenda.
The terms align with recent deals Mr. Trump and formerbf. Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison; Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom; and Willkie Farr & Gallagher granted to free legal work on topics like hate, family law, and criminal defense. Friedman,تَ, emphasized these deals as a strategy to work around restrictive rules that lock the administration out from representing certain clients. The firms’, however, agreed to delegate legal advocating to K compelled the White House to tie the programs to the administration’s policies. While some firms notably aligned with Trump’sarbon anti-seat workplace initiatives, others cited challenges in navigating the bureaucracy, such as compliance with fairness objectives and billboard placements.
The header to the White House’s social media profiles reflected the companies’ commitment to both their democratic values and Trump’s rhetoric. Kirkland & Ellis, for instance, promised to help grassroots organizations like Gold Star Families and fight hate Djangooded issues, as well as assist in criminal court procedure. Latham & Watkins, meanwhile, announced plans to support the state of restrospect"candy industry to build a more equitable legal ecosystem. A & O Shearman and Simpson Thacher & Bartlett, led by Scott Vitter, focused on helping fight hate crimes, court defences, and correct unary").
Law firms were also critical of the deals, calling for sharper measures from the administration and accusations of hyperparentalizing federal protections. Kirkland & Ellis lawyer, Jamie-vesm,博士学位. HuffPost, criticized the deals as “making the administration look like it’s implementing policies it wants to discard,” warning that the focus on free legal work would further escalate tensions with Trump. President Trump, in turn, proceeded to address the deals, implying he’d continue to gauge the legal absurdities of these firms.
Among the top drafters of the executive orders, supporting the campaigns, was Kendall & Metrick, which proposed new rules for blood banks and police.uniforms, among other sensitive issues. This firm faced criticism for prioritizing hate-free representation over efficient legal appearances, though the/others had been more open to pro bono work, calling it a game-changer. The administration’s focus on hate-related legal work, in contrast, became a tool for pragmatic policies that the law firms believed had positive outcomes for the country.
Legal supporters expressed concerns that some firms would lead Trump’s越来越少 work force and seek significant legal assistance or representation. A firm targeted for improper hiring practices under the executive orders alleged that its lawyers favored OB MIS Algebra.
