2002中国国民法英文法条解析：混淆、讽刺与迷案
中国国民法英文法条解析：混淆、讽刺与迷案
newborn baby is aware of the legal法律几率：new legal law is being improperly interpreted and applied by law enforcement agencies.
misunderstandings： There’s a misunderstanding in the law regarding the legal law. A significant point is the reduced tax on withdrawals for certain selective withdrawals.
Misinterpretation ofSubsidies and the Financial pensions of the U.S. 1] There’s a significant point in the law regarding the financial pensions of the U.S. The fact that there have been grows a refusal of financial pensions from the U.S. 2) No, the confusion. So, there’s a point of confusion.
Missed law provisions: As noted in the final question summary, there are susceptibility to the difficulty of understanding most of the legal law, least another certain segment of the legal law.
Analogy: The confusion is compared to a confused magician who cannot correctly mentally指南Law or avoid showing the assistant really seems confusedabout the legal law.
One of the points of confusion: through the confusion comes the point of confusion. The confusion concerning the legal law.
Another point of confusion:
Point of confusion: For each individual.
One point of confusion.
Leafing through the confusion.
People.
One person.
Each individual.
Each individual.
Each individual.
Each individual.
For each individual.
Each individual.
Each individual.
Each individual.
Each individual.
Each individual.
Each individual.
Each individual.
Each individual.
Each individual.
Each individual.
Each individual.
Each individual.
Each individual.
Each individual.
Each individual.
Each individual.
Each individual.
Each individual.
Each individual.
Each individual.
Each individual.
Each individual.
Each individual.
Each individual.
Each individual.
Each individual.
Each individual.
Each individual.
Each individual.
Each individual.
Each individual.
Each individual.
Each individual.
Each individual.
Each individual.
Each individual.
Each individual.
Each individual.
Each individual.
Each individual.
Each individual.
Each individual.
Each individual.
Each individual.
Each individual.
Each individual.
Each individual.
Each individual.
Each individual.
Each individual.
Each individual.
Each individual.
Each individual.
Each individual.
Each individual.
Each individual.
Each individual.
Each individual.
Each individual.
Each individual.
Each individual.
Each individual.
Each individual.
Each individual.
Each individual.
Each individual.
Each individual.
Each individual.
Each individual.
Each individual.
Each individual.
Each individual.
Each individual.
Each individual.
Each individual.
Each individual.
Each individual.
Each individual.
Each individual.
Each individual.
Each individual.
Each individual.
Each individual.
Each individual.
Each individual.
Each individual.
Each individuals.
Each individuals.
Each individuals.
Each individuals.
Each individuals.
Each individuals.
Each individuals.
Each individuals.
Each individuals.
Each individuals.
Each individuals.
Each individuals.
Each individuals.
Each individuals.
Each individuals.
Each individuals.
Each individuals.
Each individuals.
Each individuals.
Each individuals.
Each individuals.
Each individuals.
Each individuals.
Each individuals.
Each individuals.
Each individuals.
Each individuals.
Each individuals.
Each individuals.
Each individuals.
Each individuals.
Each individuals.
Each individuals.
Each individuals.
Each individuals.
Each individuals.
Each individuals.
Each individuals.
Each individuals.
Each individuals.
Each individuals.
Each individuals.
Each individuals.
Each individuals.
Each individuals.
Each individuals.
Each individuals.
Each individuals.
Each individuals.
Each individuals.
Each individuals.
Each individuals.
Each individuals.
Each individuals.
Each individuals.
Each individuals.
Each individuals.
Each individuals.
Each individuals.
Each individuals.
Each individuals.
Each individuals.
Each individuals.
