British Columbia Secures $1 Million in Assets From QuadrigaCX Co-Founder in Landmark Forfeiture Case
Provincial Government Seizes Gold Bars and Luxury Items in Groundbreaking Test of Unexplained Wealth Order Framework
In a significant development for Canada’s financial crime enforcement efforts, British Columbia has successfully secured approximately $1 million in assets connected to QuadrigaCX co-founder Michael Patryn. This forfeiture represents the most consequential test to date of the province’s unexplained wealth order framework, a relatively new tool in the fight against money laundering and financial crimes.
The Supreme Court of British Columbia granted the forfeiture after Patryn declined to challenge the government’s action. This decision effectively transfers ownership of an impressive cache of valuables to provincial authorities, including 45 gold bars, several high-end luxury watches, and more than $250,000 in cash. According to reporting from the Vancouver Sun, these assets were initially seized during a preceding investigation into Patryn’s financial activities and their connection to the now-defunct cryptocurrency exchange.
Court documentation reviewed by CoinDesk reveals that in September 2025, the provincial court issued a civil forfeiture judgment that formally transferred ownership of the seized items to British Columbia. These assets, confiscated in March 2024 through an Unexplained Wealth Order, represent a growing trend in how Canadian authorities are tackling suspected financial crimes. The Unexplained Wealth Order mechanism has become an increasingly important instrument for British Columbia law enforcement in their ongoing battle against money laundering operations, particularly those connected to cryptocurrency ventures that have left investors with significant losses.
The QuadrigaCX Connection: A History of Financial Controversy
The case against Patryn hinged on his extensive involvement in QuadrigaCX’s operations, particularly his alleged participation in the misappropriation of customer funds and digital assets. Provincial authorities argued that this connection justified the initial seizure of his assets. Following the seizure, Patryn was given the opportunity to provide legitimate explanations for his accumulated wealth, as is standard procedure under the unexplained wealth order process.
While Patryn initially contested the government’s actions on constitutional grounds—claiming that investigators had violated his Charter rights during their probe—he ultimately did not appear to defend his case when British Columbia moved forward with the formal asset seizure proceedings. This absence effectively cleared the path for the province to claim the valuable items without further legal challenges.
The dramatic collapse of QuadrigaCX in 2019 sent shockwaves through the cryptocurrency industry and left thousands of customers without access to their investments. The exchange’s downfall began with the unexpected death of CEO Gerald Cotten, after which it was discovered that substantial customer funds had disappeared from the platform. Subsequent investigations into the exchange’s operations painted a troubling picture of financial mismanagement, with evidence suggesting that Patryn was deeply enmeshed in the exchange’s activities during the critical period when customer funds were allegedly misappropriated.
Implications for Creditors and Future Enforcement Actions
The successful forfeiture of these assets opens a potential avenue for partial compensation to QuadrigaCX’s creditors, who have waited years for resolution. The court’s decision now initiates a separate legal process to determine whether any portion of the recovered gold, cash, and luxury items can be directed toward satisfying the outstanding claims of the exchange’s former customers. This development offers a glimmer of hope for investors who have seen little return on their lost investments.
“This case represents a significant milestone in the province’s effort to hold accountable those connected with major financial failures that impact everyday Canadians,” noted a source familiar with the proceedings who requested anonymity due to the sensitivity of ongoing investigations. “The unexplained wealth order framework is proving to be an effective tool in cases where traditional prosecutions might face challenges.”
The QuadrigaCX bankruptcy proceedings officially concluded in May 2023, with claimants receiving just 13 cents for every dollar they had invested in the platform. This meager return left many creditors financially devastated and searching for additional remedies. The current asset forfeiture, while significant, represents only a fraction of the total losses suffered by the exchange’s customers, estimated to exceed $100 million in cryptocurrencies and fiat currency.
A Turning Point for Cryptocurrency Regulation and Enforcement
Financial crime experts view this case as potentially transformative for how authorities approach cryptocurrency-related malfeasance. The successful application of unexplained wealth orders in this high-profile cryptocurrency case could serve as a blueprint for future enforcement actions against individuals suspected of using digital asset platforms for illicit purposes or misappropriation of investor funds.
“What we’re witnessing is the evolution of financial crime enforcement in the cryptocurrency space,” explained Dr. Rebecca Thornton, a financial crimes specialist who has studied the QuadrigaCX case extensively. “Traditional investigative approaches have often struggled to keep pace with the complexity of cryptocurrency operations, but unexplained wealth orders shift the burden of proof in a way that’s proving effective in these cases.”
The forfeiture also highlights the growing sophistication of provincial and federal authorities in tracking and seizing physical assets connected to cryptocurrency operations. While digital assets themselves can be challenging to recover if proper security measures aren’t in place, the luxury watches, gold bars, and cash seized from Patryn demonstrate that converting ill-gotten gains into physical assets doesn’t necessarily protect them from government seizure.
As British Columbia proceeds with liquidating these assets, the case stands as a warning to others in the cryptocurrency industry who might contemplate similar activities. The province’s successful action signals a heightened level of scrutiny and enforcement capability that may deter future financial misconduct in Canada’s rapidly evolving digital asset landscape.
For the thousands of former QuadrigaCX customers still recovering from their losses, the forfeiture represents both a symbolic victory and potentially a small step toward financial recovery in what has been a years-long quest for justice following one of the cryptocurrency industry’s most notorious collapses.

